Showing posts with label administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label administration. Show all posts

Friday, May 21, 2021

The Two Reflection Questions We Are Asking Every Teacher...


Thank you for viewing,

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Monday, April 11, 2016

Reflection-Points from Fierce Conversations

In preparation for the upcoming instructional week, I send a "Weekly Agenda" to all faculty and staff.
Included in each Agenda is a "Reflection" to generate personal and professional reflection in regards to a wide-range of components.

Our Administrative Team committed to participate in a book study this school-year of Sue Scott's Fierce Conversations.  Our Admin. Team consists of: High School Principal, HS Assistant Principal, MS Principal, MS Asst. Principal, Superintendent, Director of Business Services, Director of Athletics, Director of Community Relations, Director of Student Services, and Director of Facilities & Technology. 

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Instructional Blog: My Initiative for '12-13

This year, I implemented an initiative in my Academy called the "Ashbrook Instructional Blog" to encourage teachers to informally observe their peers and post short reflections on the blog.  


The blog itself is very basic, since my instructional focus was to establish comfort posting observations and reflections for group view.  My primary objective was to allow our teachers to spend time in each other's classrooms, providing opportunities for learning.  

Observations and comments were categorized: Technology, Instructional Strategies, Classroom Environment, & Assessment.

Teachers were asked to spend at least 20 minutes in the classroom and to make contact with the teacher before observing.  Teachers were also asked not to "force" the posting, since the activity was for professional growth, not as a "check-list" item.

In addition, we were able to connect this activity to the PDP's (Professional Development Plans for non-NC educators) of teachers in my Academy.  We were able to create a SMART Goal directly aligned with the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System (NCEES): 

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Summary of NC Teacher Evaluation #NCADMIN Chats

The final three #ncadmin chats involved the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation System, which continues to be a learning process for all those involved.  Through the engagement of these three chats, principals, assistant principals, teachers, and other educators were able to collaborate and discuss the standards and various elements.

All three chats have been archived in my Storify account.  It is my hope that other administrators and teachers across North Carolina use the collaborative efforts of the #ncadmin PLN as a resource when discussing the NCEES tool.

Part I (Standards I & II)

Part II (Standards III & IV)

Part III (Standards IV cont. & V)


Thanks for reading and follow me @CSmithGoBlue.

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith     and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Friday, November 9, 2012

Key Info Regarding Delay in Reporting Scores

Key information was recently shared with LEA Superintendents and Charter School Directors regarding the delay in reporting scores for the new End-of-Course assessments.  Rebecca Garland, Chief Academic Officer and Angela Quick, Deputy Chief Academic Officer, officially sent the information out on October 30, 2012.  The following is a summary of key info for districts administering EOC's in January:

"NCDPI is required to establish new academic achievement levels based on the data from the 2012-2013 administration of the newly revised assessments."

"The scores for these assessments will be delayed until October 2013, pending the scaling and standard-setting process...by the State Board of Education."

"In late January 2013, the NCDPI will provide LEA's with a 0-100 score for each EOC assessment to use for calculating the final grade for the course and to make placement and/or graduation decisions."

"Students assessed on the Algbera I/Integrated I, Biology, and English II EOC's during the fall of 2012-2013 should be assigned 'incompletes' until the 0-100 score is available."

"Once the final grade...is determined, the LEA must determine if students are inappropriately enrolled in spring 2013 courses...The new deadline to drop students...is February 28, 2013." (this will be known as the 10/20 Day Rule-normally students cannot be removed from an EOC course after the 10th instructional day of the semester.)

"The NCHSAA will allow students affected by this delay to continue to participate in athletes if they meet all other eligibility requirements."

"Once the score is available...the score must be used as at least 25% of the student's final grade for the course."

More can be found at the Department of Public Instruction's website.  This is simply to assist with communication throughout the state. 


CS

Craig Smith

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith     and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Monday, October 29, 2012

Six Walk-Through Check-Points


There are many data points to look for when completing Walk-Through's, and it is easy for administrators to be overwhelmed when trying to complete an effective five-minute Walk-Through.  I've put together six basic "Check-Points" to assist on assessing instruction during a Walk-Through.

"Six Walk-Through Check-Points"

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Energy in the Room

I recently formally observed a Beginning Teacher in my school that demonstrated how important and beneficial it is for the teacher to be the energy in the classroom.

You can find hundreds of articles and resources discussing how important it is for the teacher to be the energy in the classroom.  Why is it so important?

Two primary effects:

1.  Instructional time is maximized.

2.  The students are engaged.

You ever notice how fast an observation goes when you're in an energetic classroom?  Forty-five minutes fees like 15.  The best compliment a student can give a teacher is, at the end of the class, you hear, "It's time to go already?!?".  This only occurs when the instructional time is maximized, keeping students engaged for the entire class period.

Last week, I retweeted a tweet by @Jaymelinton (who will be moderating Wednesday's #ncadmin chat, "New Teacher Support", at 8 pm [shameless plug]), which was originally posted by @coolcatteacher:

"Students will rarely exceed the energy you put into the equation."

The importance of energy and enthusiasm was best demonstrated near the end of Thursday's observation:

Since this occurred in a world language class, I'm not sure what exactly the teacher said (it was not a Spanish class-I can normally hold my own in a Spanish class).  All of the sudden, 24 high school students had their feet off of the ground and were sitting on top of their desks, working furiously on the activity and participating with the dialogue led by the teacher.  It was some sort of quick-paced, relatively silly, "the floor has turned into hot lava that is rising towards the desk" activity.  These students could not care less about "looking cool" in front of others.  Remember, these are high school students.

Every single student participated; Every single student was engaged; This was the result of the energy in the room.

Thanks for reading!

CS

Craig Smith

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith     and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Thank you, Coach Hoke

Getting blown out on a national-stage in the Cowboys Classic against the defending national-champions was not an ideal Saturday evening for Michigan fans.  Personally, my popularity sky-rockets during Michigan games when they are playing poorly, and my phone was constantly buzzing from 9 pm to around 11.

But this post isn't about football.  It is not about the University of Michigan.  It's about sending a message.  

It's about leadership.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

"Never Lose Your Enthusiasm"

During a student interview this past spring, I was asked, "What do you think is your strongest leadership trait?"; without hesitation, I responded, "Enthusiasm."

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Summer PD and A Side of Formula

During the end of the year meeting with my teachers, I discussed how important this summer was going to be for every educator, not just in my school, county, or even North Carolina, but across the nation.  The implementation of the new Common Core curriculum standards in Math, Science, and Language Arts, combined with our Essential Standards for other subjects required time spent individually and collaboratively in preparation for the upcoming school year.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Leadership Opportunities-A Thank You to Dr. Jones

Louise Jones, my former principal, just announced that she will be leaving her current post as Principal of Hopewell High School (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools) to accept a Principal position in the Washington, D.C. School District, beginning at the end of the month.

A few months ago, I asked her for permission to blog about how so many aspiring administrators under her supervision were awarded the opportunity to lead, whether in another school, district, or state, resulting from their work at Hopewell.  I felt this reflected very positively on her leadership style, allowing those with leadership capabilities the opportunities to thrive within her school, thus making them appealing candidates when their time came.  A large number of assistant principals were given opportunities to lead their own schools, as well as dean of students given the opportunity to become assistant principals.

Personally, Dr. Jones provided me with an enormous amount of responsibility and opportunity during my Principal Internship, the final requirement for my School Administration degree from Gardner-Webb University.  She allowed me to be a full-fledged member of her administrative team and even worked the master schedule to have me teach half-day, serving as an administrator for the other half.  Many principals wouldn't dare entrust an "intern" in this capacity.  She has done this for other interns, as well, before staff cuts made this impossible in the master schedule.  Her attitude is best described by something she told me earlier this year:

"I feel we give future leaders opportunities that are sometimes not provided in other schools; 99% of the time, they step up and do well."

The experience I received during my internship was implausible, as I remember attending the seminars with other Principal Interns and hearing them complain of the tedious tasks they had been assigned and how they "wished they had more responsibility." My internship, on the other hand, fully involved me in the full day-to-day responsibilities of being a high school administrator.  This ultimately prepared me for my next opportunity.

At the end of my internship year, a Dean of Students position became available and I was fortunate enough to be offered the job.  Having just completed my internship and receiving my School Administration certification, I didn't expect to become a full-time administrator for years.  Yet, Dr. Jones entrusted me a great deal of responsibility in my position in which my duties were no different than that of an Assistant Principal.  Once again, she allowed me to build the experience necessary to work towards my own personal goals, which were aligned with the goals and mission of the school. 

I am not unique in these leadership opportunities provided by Dr. Jones.  A former assistant principal of hers, one of which I have kept in close contact with, is now a principal in South Carolina.  He told me, "I would never have been ready for be a principal if Louise hadn't trusted me and pushed me as much as she did."  I could list administrator after administrator that credited Louise for doing the same.

Last summer, I was selected as an assistant principal at my current school/district after a rigorous multi-stage interview process.  While I absolutely deserved the position and worked extremely hard to be considered and accepted, I owe a lot of my current success to Louise, due to the experience I was able to bring with me.  This experience was gained because Louise entrusted me and allowed me to grow professionally while under her leadership.

I believe the timing for her move up to our Nation's capital is ideal for her and know many factors went into her decision.  I will miss her, but due to her ongoing evolving of technology use, I know she is only a "tweet" away. 

Thank you, Louise, for the leadership opportunities you have provided.  I wish you the best in this new opportunity for your own leadership to be recognized.

Thanks for reading and follow me on Twitter @CSmithGoBlue.

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith     and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

My Response to GCS Pinnacle Technology Integration

This is a response to the blog post published on the GCS Pinnacle Blogspot regarding Technology Integration

To the GCS Instructional Tech. Facilitators and Pinnacle team,

I hope you don't mind a member of the GCS administrative team sharing my thoughts:

Through the school-based recommendations and professional development, along with the fantastic collaborative opportunities our Pinnacle teachers receive, it would be safe to say the majority of you would "Meet" and/or "Exceed" on these essential conditions.  As I picture the teachers in my building who integrate technology regularly and effectively, positively impacting student-learning, I believe they would also be rated similarly.

I believe the primary issue is the lengthy gap between teachers meeting theses standards and teachers far from reaching the technology standard.  Consequently, this alters the essential standard rating for the entire school and, more importantly, limit the adequate 21st-Century based (sorry, we agreed to simply call this "learning") learning necessary for our students to be successful.

On that note, I challenge all of our Pinnacle teachers to be technology integration leaders in your grade-level teams, PLC/PLN's, and schools, both formally and informally.  The primary reason non-tech savvy teachers shy aware from incorporating these instructional strategies is fear.  Help eliminate the fear through proactive support and collaboration, ensuring EVERY teacher MEETS these essential technology conditions.

Thank you to our Pinnacle Leaders.  Keep up the great work!!

Thanks for reading and follow me on Twitter @CSmithGoBlue.

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Thursday, June 14, 2012

The Blueberry Story: The teacher gives the businessman a lesson, by Jamie Vollmer

During the first day of the 2012 Gaston County Administrators Conference, we were privileged to have Jamie Vollner to serve as our Keynote Speaker.  He gave us permission to reprint this story and I wanted to share it:

"If I ran my business the way you people operate your schools, I wouldn't be in business very long!"

I stood before an auditorium filled with outraged teacher who were becoming angrier by the minute.  My speech had entirely consumed their precious 90 minutes of inservice.  Their initial icy glares had turned to restless agitation.  You could cut the hostility with a knife.

I represented a group of business people dedicated to improving public schools.  I was an executive at an ice cream company that became famous in the middle 1980's when People Magazine chose our blueberry as the "Best Ice Cream in America."

I was convinced of two things.  First, public schools needed to change; they were archaic selecting and sorting mechanisms designed for the industrial age and out of step with the needs of our emerging "knowledge society."  Second, educators were a major part of the problem; they resisted change, hunkered down in their feathered nests, protected by tenure, and shielded by bureaucratic monopoly.  They needed to look to business.  We knew how to produce quality.  Zero defects!  TQM!  Continuous improvement!

In retrospect, the speech was perfectly balanced - equal parts ignorance and arrogance.

As soon as I finished, a woman's hand shot up.  She appeared polite, pleasant--she was, in face, a razor-edged, veteran, high school English teacher who had been waiting to unload.

She began quietly, "We are told, sir, that you manage a company that makes good ice cream."

I smugly replied, "Best ice cream in American, Ma'am."

"How nice," she said.  "Is it rich and smooth."

"Sixteen percent butterfat," I crowed.

"Premium ingredients?" she inquired.

"Super-premium!  Nothing but triple A."  I was on a roll.  I never saw the next line coming.

"Mr. Vollmer," she said, leaning forward with a wicked eyebrow raised to the sky, "when you are standing on your receiving dock and you see an inferior shipment of blueberries arrive, what do you do?"

In the silence of that room, I could hear the trap snap...I was dead meat, but I wasn't going to lie.

"I send them back."

She jumped to her feet.  "That's right!" she barked, "and we can never send back our blueberries.  We take them big, small, rich, poor, gifted, exceptional, abused, frightened, confident, homeless, rude, and brilliant.  We take them with ADHD, junior rheumatoid arthritis, and English as their second language.  We take them all!  Every one!  And that, Mr. Vollmer, is why it's not a business.  It's a school!"

In an explosion, all 290 teachers, principals, bus drivers, aides, custodians, and secretaries jumped to their feet and yelled, "Yeah!  Blueberries!  Blueberries!"

And so began my long transformation.

Since then, I have visited hundred of schools.  I have learned that a school is not a business.  Schools are unable to control the quality of their raw material, they are dependent upon the vagaries of politics for a reliable revenue stream, and they are constantly mauled by a howling horde of disparate, competing customer groups that would send the best CEO screaming into the night.

None of this negates the need for change.  We must change what, when, and how we teach to give all children maximum opportunity to thrive in a post-industrial society.  But educators cannot do this along; these changes can occur only with the understanding, trust, permission, and active support from the surrounding community.  For the most important thing I have learned is that schools reflect the attitudes, beliefs and health of the communities they serve, and therefore, to improve public education means more than changing our schools, it means changing America.

Jamie Robert Vollmer ©2011

Jamie Vollmer is a former business executive and attorney who now works to increase public support for America's public schools.  His new book, Schools Cannot Do It Alone is available at http://www.jamievollmer.com/

Friday, June 1, 2012

Senate Bill 795 Continued...

The calendar has turned to June and Senate Bill 795, the "Excellent Public Schools Act", is not officially approved, but it is "tentatively approved".   My original post about Bill 795 discusses many, but not all, of the main components of the bill.


The Senate passed the 2nd reading of Bill 795 yesterday (May 31st), which has been mostly supported by Republicans, yet opposed by Democrats. 


Financial details were discussed in the controversial Pay-for-Performance component with an expected cost of $45.6 million for the first year of implementation.  The cost may rise to an astounding $82.3 million by 2016-2017.  The Pay-for-Performance component would require each individual LEA to create and implement their own teacher-payment plan, resulting in hundreds of various formats state-wide.  Many have doubts on where this funding will come from, given our current financial struggles in education.


In the Teacher Tenure component, Republicans are pushing for new teachers to be initially placed on one-year contracts, allowing principals and superintendents to approve if the teacher remains on staff for the following year.  After passing the initial licensure/Beginning Teacher status, teachers would be given four-year contracts.  This is similar to the current contract systems of assistant principals and principals, but Democrats are requesting for this to be removed from Bill 795.


Tenure would be eliminated, but teachers who currently "have" tenure in North Carolina would not lose it.  


I feel that it is extremely important for all educators in North Carolina to stay abreast on the components and amendments of Bill 795.  These components will drastically change public education in North Carolina.  The final vote is set for Monday, June 4th.


You can check out the history and information of the bill here.


Thanks for reading and follow me via Twitter @CSmithGoBlue.  

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Monday, May 14, 2012

The Magnitude of Senate Bill 795

The proposed "Excellent Public Schools Act" is an intensive education reform contained in Senate Bill 795.  After reading the 12 parts of the Act in great deal, I tweeted:

"I hope every teacher is aware of how Senate Bill 795 & the proposed "Excellent Public Schools Act" will change education in #NC."

The North Carolina Association of School Administrators did a great job of seeking input from its members on the components of Senate Bill 795.  The NCASA used the responses to "guide a focus group of superintendents, personnel directors and principals who participated in a full-day discussion on each component (NCASA, 2012).  The NCASA created a Review and Recommendations for each component of Senate Bill 795.

I have listed some of the potential changes resulting from the Excellent Public Schools Act.  I have attempted to not include my own opinions, but rather share some of the potential changes.  Keep in mind, this is a 12-part Act, so not every component is listed:

THE BIG ONE (in my opinion): "Pay for Excellence" would allow each local school board to establish performance pay for all licensed school employees.  (Note: The NCASA is recommending a timeline, involving piloted districts, which wouldn't be concluded until 2014-2015.)

THE REALLY BIG ONE:  Tenure (or Career Status) would be eliminated.  In addition, the following would be eliminated: RIF provisions, the requirement of providing reasons for contract non-renewal, hearings before hearing officers, among others.  There is some discussion of having teachers be placed on similar contracts to principals and assistant principals, which are two-year initial contracts, followed by four-year contracts.  This component would greatly impact every teacher in North Carolina.

There is a focus to improve literacy in K-3 education, but does not specify if each Local Education Agency (LEA) will have the flexibility to determine how it will enhance literacy through appropriate policy.

The "grading system" used by the state of North Carolina would assign A-F to each school, based predominately on EOG/EOC test performance. (Note: The NCASA is strongly opposing this.)

The school calendar, specifically start/end dates, would be adjusted.  Right now, schools cannot start sooner than August 25.  This Bill would all the start date to "the next to the last Monday in August".  This potentially could only move the start of school up a few days, with August 20 as the earliest possible.  (Note: The NCASA wants to restore LEA flexibility in setting start/end dates, especially with the start of school.)

Elementary Education Teachers (K-6) would need to demonstrate proficiency in teaching Reading, Language Arts, and Mathematics. 

I strongly recommend every teacher and school leader become familiar with the aspects of this proposed Act.  If it is passed, it will drastically reform the entire public educational system in North Carolina.  Discussion will resume on May 16 by the Senate.

Thanks for reading and follow me via Twitter @CSmithGoBlue.  

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Information Technology Essential Standards

The Instructional Facilitator's did a great job with their presentation on the Information Technology Essential Standards last month for both Principal's and Assistant Principals.  The link to the presentation can be found here:



ITES

The YouTube clips are great, demonstrating some of the strategies that allow teachers to incorporate these standards into their instruction.  I really like the young girl explaining how "QR Codes" work.  As a matter of fact, I created a QR code the day after the meeting and it is still on my office door.

Located in the presentation are five "Fast Facts" of the ITES:


  • The ITES are to be embedded within all areas of the curriculum.
  • Classroom teachers are responsible for teaching the new ITES standards beginning this current school year.
  • Media Coordinators and Technology Facilitators, as ITES experts, will collaborate with teachers to plan, create, teach, and assess effective student instruction.
  • The ITES must be taught in all North Carolina schools-in places where technology is prevalent, as well as schools with limited technology access.
  • Technology and information tools and resources must be taught and used in authentic ways.

This is simply a small sampling of the technology needed to incorporate the new Information Technology Essential Standards into our classrooms.  It's important for school leaders to become familiar with these standards, as well as comfortable discussing their implement them into instruction.    


Thanks for reading and follow me via Twitter @CSmithGoBlue

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Monday, April 23, 2012

Pre-Payment Update for NC Educators

In November, I published a post called "No More Pre-Payment for Educators in NC"

In an effort to address concerns raised by teachers and still move forward with ending pre-payment as called for under the 2011 law change, the N.C. Association of School Administrators and the N.C. School Boards Association gave the committee chairs a slightly revised proposal from the previous array of pay date options that we had endorsed. The revised proposal from NCASA and NCSBA would do the following:
  • Delay the ending of pre-payment until July 1, 2013 for all districts.
  • Require all school districts to provide their first paycheck by Aug. 31 each school year but include pay only for the days worked.
  • Allow for district flexibility with the establishment of pay dates that would follow the initial August pay date.
  • Allow for multiple payroll checks each month.
  • Enable an early payroll date in December.

Here is the revised proposal from the NCASA and NCSBA Regarding Pay Date Options for School Districts in North Carolina

To all educators in North Carolina, make sure to follow this story.  It impacts all of us!

Thanks for reading and follow me via Twitter @CSmithGoBlue

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

The Proposal in NC & My Thoughts

There have been some hot stove topics recently in the local media dealing with student-athletes.  Here are some of my thoughts:

There is a debated discussion right now dealing with high school athletics in North Carolina and whether parochial and charter schools should compete in the same postseason as public schools.  Some schools are currently members of the North Carolina High School Athletic Association and belong to NCHSAA conferences, thus competing in the same postseason for team and individual state championships.  Recently, a proposal was put forth into motion to allow these schools to continue competing in their conferences, but have separate state playoffs (only parochial and charter schools). 

The basis for this proposal was due to the fact that parochial and charter schools do not have any attendance boundaries, where public schools have strict attendance boundaries.  I can speak from experience: the required paperwork for each student-athlete to verify they indeed live in the correct zone is endless in my previous district. 

Is it fair to have these schools compete against each other in state competition?  In my high school athletic career, I played at a public school and we would qualify for the Men's Tennis State Tournament and have to compete against Detroit Country Day School and University Ligget, both private schools.  One year, in which we finished 4th overall (the previously mentioned two schools finished #1-2), we joked about being state runners-up in the "public school tournament".  We were all competing, but definitely were not on a level playing field.  Then again, that was public vs private, which we already have the private-school competition. 

I also wonder why Magnet schools have not been included in this proposal.  If the primary reasoning is attendance, shouldn't Magnet schools be included?  Magnet schools pull students from anywhere within their district, regardless of their "home school".  In some districts which allow in-district transfer, a student has to sit out for 365 days before competing in athletics.  Student-athletes are allowed to play immediately in Magnet schools.

If Magnet Schools are included, then what about schools with International Baccalaureate (IB) programs?  These students don't necessarily attend the school closest to their home address.  I would hate to think students would chose not to participate in an IB program because of athletics, but it very well could happen.

If this proposal is adopted, it could drastically change high school athletics in North Carolina.  I will be very interested to see the result of the proposal and the ongoing discussion that will certainly take place.

Thanks for reading and follow me via Twitter @CSmithGoBlue

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

What Sean Payton's Suspension Can Remind School Leaders



The recently suspended Head Coach of the National Football League's New Orleans Saints: "As the head coach, anything that happens within the framework of your team and your program, you're responsible for."

This is an extremely important reminder to all School Leaders, especially Principals.  I think anyone involved in education can simply replace "head coach" with "school leader" and "team" with "school", resulting in the following:  "As the school leader, anything that happens within the framework of your school, you're responsible for."

The great Bobby Bowden said, "It was my job to be a chief executive officer and oversee the entire program.", when discussing the importance of having an idea of what was going on throughout his program.  He also acknowledged that, due to the size of a Division I college football program, it was impossible to stay on top of every single individual.  Therefore, he put forth a large emphasis on surrounding himself with assistant coaches that held the same beliefs about right and wrong.  He relied heavily on their judgement to make him aware of anything worthy of attention.

School leaders must also do the same.  It is an unrealistic expectation for a Principal to be directly involved in every single aspect of the school, as this type of micro-managing would drain any school leader into immediate burn-out.  But, as Coach Sean Payton eluded to, the school leader is responsible for everything within the framework of the school.  Therefore, it is crucial for a Principal to surround themselves with an administrative team in which they trust, as well as empower teacher leaders within the school.

We live in the modern society where responsibility must always fall to someone and, fair or unfair, this usually falls to the top.  Sean Payton's suspension, although unrelated to education, is a perfect reminder to all school leaders. 

Thanks for reading and follow me via Twitter @CSmithGoBlue

CS

The opinions shared in this blog belong to Craig Smith and do not represent the school or district in which he works.